|
W.U.S.V. 2nd selection trial 17th & 18th April 2010
Well there’s an old welsh saying that one man’s
volcanic ash is another man’s judging appointment.
Yes the weekend that Europe came to a stand-still coincided
with our second W.U.S.V. trial, Hence Dieter Schmale could
not travel and yours truly was drafted in to judge.
As I arrived at the club ground I was very impressed. The
W.U.S.V. flag and National flags were flying, and the field
looked superb.
The clubhouse was busy with Severnside members ensuring
everyone was fed and watered.
This trial was one of the best organised I have ever been
to.
The tracking draw kicked started the event followed by the
temperament test.
We then went to the Tracking fields.
Heartfelt thanks to Gavin Smith and Gary
Kakhian who laid eighteen tracks in a professional
manner as per the SV guidelines.
Overview of the Tracking A
V = 1
SG = 7
G = 4
B = 1
M = 5
Only one team hit the excellent:
Henriette Bohnstedt with Beckenberry Casper 96 (V)
Which was surprising as the tracking land was short lush pasture.
There were many teams who managed an SG some missed articles,
but it was a general lack of intensity and commitment where
most of the points were lost.
Overview of the Obedience B
V = 0
SG = 4
G = 7
B = 4
M = 2
I must start by mentioning the members of the group in the
heelwork pattern, at no point was I kept waiting they were
always in position before the dog took the left turn towards
them and their discipline was constant throughout the seventeen
rounds of obedience. The same can be said of Phil
Sergent who fired the gun shots, ensuring that every
dog had the same test.
I was looking for a team who worked with precision, speed,
and a harmonious relationship between dog and handler. Many
teams achieved this in individual exercises but would then
lose several points on one or two exercises.
Dougie Bannerman and Carmen had a High in trial
93(SG) points
If I could have changed anything it would have been to cut
my critiques down and possibly I should have asked for a steward
for the dog in the long down under distraction.
Overview of the Protection C
V = 0
SG = 6
G = 7
M = 2
B = 2
As is customary I have to start off with the two helpers
Danny Roberts and Saul Wolsencroft.
From beginning to end the work was exemplary the attacks and
re-attacks were fast and explosive the drives put the dogs
under pressure. They worked every dog without fear or favour,
regardless of its individual strength and speed. Both were
strong and fit enough to cope with all seventeen dogs.
I would also like to praise the standard of the handling
in the protection; there were very few Handler errors and
very few extra commands. Most of the points were lost in the
quality of the grips and a lack of control.
Unfortunately there were no excellent scores though Geoff
Tordoff and Bandit came very close with his High
in trial 95(SG) points.
Looking at the overview I may have been a little generous
with some of the SG`s awarded but I had a very clear idea
of where I would place the dogs.
For me the dog that is fully committed to the combat bites
full with a hard grip and guards as though he means it deserves
the SG.
On behalf of all the people who attended the trial I must
thank all the Ladies in the café who worked non stop
on the Sunday to keep the large crowd fed.
A special thank you to Linda Gammon who prepared all the score
books certificates, and “bewrtegungliste” (don’t
ask your better off not knowing what it is) in a timely and
correct manner.
Finally I would like to thank all the Handlers who accepted
all my decisions in the spirit of the sport.
Although I was a last minute replacement I still felt incredibly
proud and humble to have been allowed to judge this trial.
I fully appreciated that handler’s hopes and aspiration
to make the UK team were at stake.
My old friend Don Harrison used to say
“A trial lets you know where you are at in your
training”
I hope that when individual handlers look at the results they
will see where they are at in their training.
Click here for scores.
By: Jim Jackson
|